Once a week Deesa led Moti Guj, the elephant, down to the river.
P. After inspection the two would stand up.
Q. Then Deesa looked at his feet and examined his whole body for sores.
R. The animal knew it was time to return.
S. The elephant lay down on his side, while Deesa rubbed him with a coir scrubber. Both the elephant and the trainer would return home.
A.They think that India will disintegrate like the SovletUnion or Yugoslavia.
B. What will be the exact shape of India in 2000 A.D can only be a matter of surmise.
C On the contrary, the blind patriots for see a very bright future for India.
D.The prophets of doom say that the future c doomed.
Rearange the following sentences.
A. whether explicitly or implicitly,
B. it helps to have some basis by which
C. Once you've conducted assessments of your organization,
D. To analyse the results.
Which of the following should be the FIRST sentence aftff rearrangement?
Which of the following is not a likely cause of readiness, shown by people towards adolescents?
Increase in crime
Equality of opportunity
Physical presence of youth
Increased social unrest
In the below mentioned question, a sentence has been broken into different parts. These parts have been numbered Choose the correct order of these parts from the given alternatives.
1. The day before,
2. I had dropped my daughter off
3. At pre-school and told her I was
4. Flying to the East coast so
5. I wouldn’t see
6. Her that night
5, 6, 4, 3, 2, 1
4, 6, 3, 2, 1, 5
1, 3, 2, 4, 6, 5
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Which of the following will be the second sentence after rearrangement ?
Which of the following will be the LAST sentence?
a. understandably, high profile business barons have begun lobbying for a change in SEBI’s takeover code.b. This flies in the face of the logic.c. Promoters are not required to hold 100 percent equity in a company to control it.d. One of the suggestions is that raiders should be asked to make an open offer for 100 percent of the target’s equity, not just 20 percent.e. Why should raiders be asked to do so?f. Besides, it would become prohibitively expensive for potential predators to dislodge managements, regardless of their performance, and be a body blow to shareholders democracy.