1. What a man cannot state, he does not perfectly know.
2. A man cannot state if he does not perfect know.
3. A man cannot perfectly know if he does not state.
4. What a man cannot state is the reason he does not perfectly know
A man cannot perfectly know if he does not state.
1. There is no objection to him joining the party.
2. There is no objection on him joining the party.
3. No objection will be raised upon him joining the party.
4. There is no objection to his joining the party.
There is no objection to his joining the party.
1. Everyone is expected to attend the afternoon session but the field supervisor and I.
2. Everybody is expected to attend the afternoon session but the field supervisor and I.
3. Everyone is expected to attend the afternoon session but the field supervisor and me.
4. All are expected to attend the afternoon session but the field supervisor and myself.
Everyone is expected to attend the afternoon session but the field supervisor and me.
1. Peter Sellers
2. the author
3. Bharadvaja
4. the Nazis
5. Bhrigu
Bharadvaja
1. to bring out the contrast between the socialists and the fascists.
2. to show that how others see us may be different from how we see ourselves.
3. to exemplify the fact that the members of the fascist party are viewed by the common man as murderers.
4. to demonstrate that the rural socialist was not as naive as the fascist party worker took him to be. (5) to emphasize that how others see us is as important as how we see ourselves
to show that how others see us may be different from how we see ourselves.
1. point to the other identities that the Jews have.
2. negate the infliction of characteristics from without.
3. reflect the attitudes of tbe age in which the play was written.
4. illustrate the anguish of a person who has to live with the identity given to him.
5. draw attention to the fact that not all human beings are the same.
illustrate the anguish of a person who has to live with the identity given to him.
1. only A and C
2. only D and E
3. Only B and D
4. Only B,C and D
5. Only A,C and E
Only B and D
1. the attribution of negative qualities to a person or a group tends to make him or them that way.
2. the unity among the Jews has been created by the opposition they have had to face.
3. the anti-Jews are responsible for the shortcomings oftbe Jews.
4. people, in general. expect the Jews to have certain typical characteristics.
the attribution of negative qualities to a person or a group tends to make him or them that way.
1. Careful evaluation of all factors would be needed if such a defence were to be attempted.
2. It is very unlikely that such a complex defence would even be attempted
3. The result would be either a purely instrumental view of animals, or the absolute prohibition of all animal experimentation.
4. No compromise would be possible in such matters, with attendant ethical considerations
5. The result. would be consensual view on the ethical aspects of animal experimentation
It is very unlikely that such a complex defence would even be attempted
1. Shareholders,then, should display social responsibility.
2. In the final analysis though, social needs are met since shareholders are but members of society.
3. But then, social needs have never been accorded anything more than lip service.
4. Then, unless the market is treated as the arbiter of decisions on human welfare. the question of social justice and welfare would be pushed to the margins.
5. But then, benefits to one segment of society eventually percolates to other segments as well
Then, unless the market is treated as the arbiter of decisions on human welfare. the question of social justice and welfare would be pushed to the margins.